Lesson 15 of 195 minutes

Rolling Without Slipping and Coupled Motion

Start with the lesson question, connect the representations, and test the model with evidence.

rolling without slippingstatic frictioncoupled motionenergyrotational dynamics

Learning objectives

  • Model rotational kinetic energy.
  • Relate angular impulse and angular momentum.
  • Analyze coupled translation and rotation.
Lesson flowHook, model, explanationShow guidance

Inspect the opening phenomenon

Predict what changes, then name the evidence.

Apply in the lab

Name the evidence before reading the answer.

Read only what helps

Then use the lab and recall check.

More when needed

Transcript and resources stay available below.

Course progress

AP Physics 1 — Algebra-Based · Energy and Momentum of Rotating Systems · Lesson 15

Rolling Without Slipping and Coupled Motion

In progress

Decision challenge

Observe the phenomenon. Then connect the representations.

Use the opening example to make a prediction, identify evidence, and explain which model supports it.

The Bottom of a Rolling Wheel Is Stopped | AP Physics 1

Predict the top, center, and contact-point speeds for a wheel rolling without slipping.

Combine translation and rotation, apply the no-slip constraint, and connect inertia to rolling acceleration.

Before

Predict the top, center, and contact-point speeds for a wheel rolling without slipping.

During

Pause at v equals R omega and identify the condition required for that constraint.

After

Explain why a solid cylinder reaches the bottom before a hoop released from the same height.

Reference drawerTranscript, source notes, scripts, and package status stay tucked away until you need them.7 files

Lesson reading

live

5 min

Video script

draft

Transcript fallback

available

courses/ap-physics-1/modules/06-energy-and-momentum-of-rotating-systems/lessons/02-rolling-without-slipping-and-coupled-motion/video-transcript.md

Testing the No-Slip Rolling Model

draft

1 hr 15 min

Mastery check

live

7 questions / 18 min

Book section:courses/ap-physics-1/modules/06-energy-and-momentum-of-rotating-systems/lessons/02-rolling-without-slipping-and-coupled-motion/book-section.md
Transcript for accessibility and fallback

--- lesson_slug: 02-rolling-without-slipping-and-coupled-motion duration_seconds: 55 --- # Transcript A rolling wheel moves forward—but the point touching the ground is instantaneously stopped. The center translates at v. Rotation adds v forward at the top and v backward at the bottom. So the top moves at two v, the center at v, and contact at zero. That cancellation is rolling without slipping: v equals R omega. If the wheel slides, this equation is not yet valid. Down the same ramp, a solid cylinder beats a hoop. Its mass lies closer to the axis, so less energy is locked into rotation. Pause: if radius doubles at the same angular speed, what happens to the center speed? It doubles. Learn the full rolling model free in AP Physics 1 at EduQuest AI.

Reading lab

Core explanation

Connect the lesson's words, diagrams, graphs, evidence, and equations.

Driving question

How can one contact condition lock a body's translation and rotation together?

Before: predict the race

A solid cylinder and a hoop have equal mass and radius and start from rest at the same ramp height. Predict which arrives first and name the evidence your model needs.

Hook: the contact point is instantaneously at rest

For pure rolling on a stationary surface, the wheel's bottom point has zero instantaneous velocity relative to the ground. The center translates at vcmv_{cm} while rotation contributes an equal backward speed RωR\omega at contact:

vcm=Rω.v_{cm}=R\omega.

This is a kinematic constraint, not an extra force.

Velocity map for a rolling wheel

Coupled kinematics

When RR is constant and rolling remains no-slip,

acm=Rα.a_{cm}=R\alpha.

The top point moves at 2vcm2v_{cm} relative to the ground, the center at vcmv_{cm}, and the contact point at zero. These are instantaneous velocities; the material point at contact still has centripetal acceleration.

Worked example: wheel speed

A wheel of radius 0.25 m0.25\text{ m} rolls without slipping at vcm=3.0 m/sv_{cm}=3.0\text{ m/s}. Then

ω=vcmR=3.00.25=12 rad/s.\omega=\frac{v_{cm}}{R}=\frac{3.0}{0.25}=12\text{ rad/s}.

If acm=1.5 m/s2a_{cm}=1.5\text{ m/s}^2, then α=6.0 rad/s2\alpha=6.0\text{ rad/s}^2.

Energy partitions in rolling

For a rigid object,

K=12Mvcm2+12Icmω2.K=\frac12Mv_{cm}^2+\frac12I_{cm}\omega^2.

Writing Icm=kMR2I_{cm}=kMR^2 and using vcm=Rωv_{cm}=R\omega gives

K=12Mvcm2(1+k).K=\frac12Mv_{cm}^2(1+k).

Rolling from rest down through height hh with negligible losses:

Mgh=12Mv2(1+k),v=2gh1+k.Mgh=\frac12Mv^2(1+k),\qquad v=\sqrt{\frac{2gh}{1+k}}.

A solid cylinder has k=1/2k=1/2 and a hoop has k=1k=1, so the cylinder reaches a larger speed from the same height.

Energy partition comparison

Numerical comparison

At h=0.60 mh=0.60\text{ m} with g=9.8 m/s2g=9.8\text{ m/s}^2:

vcyl=2(9.8)(0.60)1.5=2.80 m/s,v_{cyl}=\sqrt{\frac{2(9.8)(0.60)}{1.5}}=2.80\text{ m/s},

vhoop=2(9.8)(0.60)2=2.42 m/s.v_{hoop}=\sqrt{\frac{2(9.8)(0.60)}{2}}=2.42\text{ m/s}.

Static friction: constraint enforcer

Static friction prevents relative sliding at contact when the needed force does not exceed μsN\mu_sN. On a passive object rolling down a ramp, friction points uphill and supplies the torque that increases ω\omega. In other driven situations it can point downhill or be zero. Determine its direction from the required no-slip dynamics—not from the center's motion alone.

For an object rolling down angle θ\theta,

Mgsinθfs=Ma,Mg\sin\theta-f_s=Ma,

fsR=Iα,f_sR=I\alpha,

and a=Rαa=R\alpha. Therefore,

a=gsinθ1+I/(MR2).a=\frac{g\sin\theta}{1+I/(MR^2)}.

Force and torque model on a ramp

During: retrieval pause

Without calculating, rank the acceleration of a hoop, solid cylinder, and solid sphere of equal radius on the same ramp. Explain using k=I/(MR2)k=I/(MR^2).

Coupled bodies

A cord that does not slip on a pulley couples linear and angular variables: v=Rωv=R\omega and a=Rαa=R\alpha. The pulley needs a net torque, so tensions on its two sides generally differ. Treat each body and the pulley as separate systems, then connect their equations using the constraint.

Misconception checks

  • Static friction need not dissipate mechanical energy. For ideal rolling on a stationary rigid surface, the contact point has zero instantaneous displacement.
  • Zero contact-point velocity does not mean zero acceleration.
  • Equal mass and radius do not imply equal rolling acceleration; mass distribution sets II.
  • If slipping occurs, do not use v=Rωv=R\omega automatically.

After: explain and transfer

A wheel begins sliding and spinning, then transitions to rolling. State which constraint becomes valid only after slipping stops, and describe how you would test that claim from video data.

AP-style synthesis

For every rolling problem: define the system, decide whether no-slip is justified, draw forces, write translation and rotation equations or an energy model, impose the constraint only when valid, and check units plus limiting cases.

Further learning

See sources.yaml for the College Board alignment and OpenStax verification references. This lesson and all problems are original and do not imply College Board endorsement.

Practice labTesting the No-Slip Rolling ModelOpen this when you are ready to apply the model, collect evidence, and check your explanation.1 hr 15 min

Lab: Testing the No-Slip Rolling Model

Objective

Test vcm=Rωv_{cm}=R\omega and determine how mass distribution changes acceleration down a ramp.

Safety

Work with teacher or responsible-adult supervision. Secure a low-angle ramp, use only low-mass blunt rolling objects, install a soft catch box, and keep hands and feet outside the lane. Do not use glass, sharp, motorized, or high-speed objects. Stop if the ramp shifts or an object bounces unpredictably.

Materials

  • secured ramp, meterstick, and angle tool;
  • solid cylinder and hoop-like object with visible rotation markers;
  • balance and ruler/caliper;
  • fixed phone slow-motion video or motion sensor;
  • soft stop and data table.

Accessible alternative: use teacher-provided videos with frame numbers, scale, and tactile/high-contrast object descriptions. A student may direct measurements and analysis without handling apparatus.

Simulation alternative: use a teacher-approved rolling simulation and record its idealizations.

Steps

  1. Measure each object's MM and RR and document instrument resolution.
  2. Secure the ramp at a low angle and mark a common release line and analysis region.
  3. Place a high-contrast radial marker on each object.
  4. Predict which object accelerates faster using I=kMR2I=kMR^2.
  5. Release without pushing and record at least five trials per object.
  6. From frames, measure center position x(t)x(t) and angular position θ(t)\theta(t).
  7. Estimate vcmv_{cm} and ω\omega over matched intervals; calculate vcm/(Rω)v_{cm}/(R\omega).
  8. Fit xx versus t2t^2 or velocity versus time to estimate acceleration.
  9. Preserve raw data, identify excluded trials, and state the exclusion rule.

Expected Result

For valid no-slip trials, vcm/(Rω)v_{cm}/(R\omega) should be near 1 within uncertainty. The object with smaller I/(MR2)I/(MR^2) should accelerate faster.

Analysis

Report measured quantities with units and uncertainty. Graph vcmv_{cm} against RωR\omega with an equal-value reference line. Compare measured accelerations with a=gsinθ/(1+k)a=g\sin\theta/(1+k). Discuss surface deformation, camera perspective, release impulse, and slipping as limitations.

Reflection Questions

  1. What evidence distinguishes rolling from simultaneous sliding and spinning?
  2. Why can static friction be present without reducing mechanical energy in the ideal model?
  3. Does the contact point have zero acceleration? Explain.
  4. Which measurement dominates uncertainty in the constraint ratio?

Extension Challenge

Increase the ramp angle gradually within the supervisor-approved safe range. Identify when the no-slip model first becomes questionable and defend the criterion with data.