Lesson 13 of 195 minutes

Rotational Kinematics and Moment of Inertia

Start with the lesson question, connect the representations, and test the model with evidence.

angular positionangular velocityangular accelerationrigid bodymoment of inertiarolling

Learning objectives

  • Calculate and compare torques about a chosen axis.
  • Connect rotational and translational dynamics.
  • Use rotational equilibrium as an evidence model.
Lesson flowHook, model, explanationShow guidance

Inspect the opening phenomenon

Predict what changes, then name the evidence.

Apply in the lab

Name the evidence before reading the answer.

Read only what helps

Then use the lab and recall check.

More when needed

Transcript and resources stay available below.

Course progress

AP Physics 1 — Algebra-Based · Torque and Rotational Dynamics · Lesson 13

Rotational Kinematics and Moment of Inertia

In progress

Decision challenge

Observe the phenomenon. Then connect the representations.

Use the opening example to make a prediction, identify evidence, and explain which model supports it.

Same Wheel, Different Speeds | AP Physics 1

Predict whether points at half-radius and full radius on one rigid wheel have the same tangential speed.

Compare wheel points at half and full radius, then apply the radius-squared inertia relationship.

Before

Predict whether points at half-radius and full radius on one rigid wheel have the same tangential speed.

During

Pause at the radius relation and calculate the outer-to-inner tangential-speed ratio.

After

Explain why moving a point mass to twice the radius makes its inertia contribution four times larger.

Reference drawerTranscript, source notes, scripts, and package status stay tucked away until you need them.7 files

Lesson reading

live

5 min

Video script

draft

Transcript fallback

available

courses/ap-physics-1/modules/05-torque-and-rotational-dynamics/lessons/02-rotational-kinematics-and-moment-of-inertia/video-transcript.md

Test Rotational Inertia by Mass Distribution

draft

1 hr 25 min

Mastery check

live

7 questions / 15 min

Book section:courses/ap-physics-1/modules/05-torque-and-rotational-dynamics/lessons/02-rotational-kinematics-and-moment-of-inertia/book-section.md
Transcript for accessibility and fallback

# Accessible transcript: Same Wheel, Different Speeds Two points on one rigid wheel can have different speeds. Every point completes each revolution together, so points at half-radius and full radius share the same angular speed. But tangential speed equals radius times angular speed. The full-radius point moves twice as fast. Mass distribution matters too. Move a point mass to twice the radius and its moment-of-inertia contribution becomes four times larger. Quick check: do all wheel points share radial acceleration? Pause. No. Radial acceleration equals r omega squared, so it grows with radius. Learn rotation free at EduQuest AI. ## Visual description One wheel marks points at half-radius and full radius. Both sweep the same angle, while tangent arrows show the outer point moving twice as fast. A point mass then shifts outward, and its inertia bar quadruples.

Reading lab

Core explanation

Connect the lesson's words, diagrams, graphs, evidence, and equations.

Driving question

How do angular motion and mass distribution determine the response of a rotating rigid body?

Before learning: points on one wheel

Mark one point at radius R/2R/2 and another at radius RR on a rigid wheel. As it rotates, compare their angular displacement, angular velocity, linear distance, tangential speed, and radial acceleration.

Hook: same angular speed, different linear speed

Every point on a rigid wheel completes each revolution together, so all points share angular velocity. But a point farther from the axis travels a longer arc and moves faster linearly.

Angular variables

Angular displacement is measured in radians:

θ=sr.\theta=\frac{s}{r}.

Angular velocity and acceleration are

ω=dθdt,α=dωdt.\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt},\qquad \alpha=\frac{d\omega}{dt}.

Slope of θ(t)\theta(t) is ω\omega; slope of ω(t)\omega(t) is α\alpha. Signed area under ω(t)\omega(t) is angular displacement.

Aligned angular-position angular-velocity and angular-acceleration graphs

Constant-angular-acceleration model

When α\alpha is constant,

ω=ω0+αt,\omega=\omega_0+\alpha t, Δθ=ω0t+12αt2,\Delta\theta=\omega_0t+\frac12\alpha t^2, ω2=ω02+2αΔθ.\omega^2=\omega_0^2+2\alpha\Delta\theta.

These equations mirror constant-acceleration translation but require radians and consistent signs.

Worked example

A wheel starts at 2.0 rad/s2.0\text{ rad/s} and accelerates at 3.0 rad/s23.0\text{ rad/s}^2 for 4.0 s4.0\text{ s}:

ω=14.0 rad/s,\omega=14.0\text{ rad/s}, Δθ=(2.0)(4.0)+12(3.0)(4.0)2=32 rad.\Delta\theta=(2.0)(4.0)+\frac12(3.0)(4.0)^2=32\text{ rad}.

Angular-to-linear relationships

For a rigid body,

s=rθ,vt=rω,at=rα,s=r\theta,\qquad v_t=r\omega,\qquad a_t=r\alpha,

and radial acceleration is

ar=rω2=vt2r.a_r=r\omega^2=\frac{v_t^2}{r}.

Two wheel points share omega but have different tangential speeds

Tangential acceleration changes speed; radial acceleration changes direction. They are perpendicular components.

Rotational inertia

Rotational inertia measures resistance to angular acceleration about a stated axis:

I=imiri2I=\sum_i m_ir_i^2

for point masses. It depends on total mass, mass distribution, and axis. Units are kg\cdotpm2\text{kg·m}^2.

Equal masses arranged near and far from a rotation axis

Worked comparison

Two 0.50 kg0.50\text{ kg} point masses are placed symmetrically at radius 0.20 m0.20\text{ m}:

I=2(0.50)(0.20)2=0.040 kg\cdotpm2.I=2(0.50)(0.20)^2=0.040\text{ kg·m}^2.

Moving them to 0.40 m0.40\text{ m} makes I=0.160 kg\cdotpm2I=0.160\text{ kg·m}^2, four times larger.

Common rigid-body models

About central symmetry axes:

Ihoop=MR2,qquadIdisk=12MR2,qquadIrod,center=112ML2.I_{hoop}=MR^2,qquad I_{disk}=\frac12MR^2,qquad I_{rod,center}=\frac1{12}ML^2.

The model must match geometry and axis. A hoop has greater II than a solid disk with the same MM and RR because more mass lies farther out.

Axis dependence and parallel-axis idea

Moving an axis away from the center of mass increases inertia:

I=Icm+Md2.I=I_{cm}+Md^2.

Use this theorem only for parallel axes and a known center-of-mass-axis inertia.

Rolling constraint

For rolling without slipping,

vcm=Rω,qquadacm=Rαv_{cm}=R\omega,qquad a_{cm}=R\alpha

for the tangential rolling acceleration relationship under appropriate conditions. Sliding breaks the constraint.

During learning: rotational audit

  1. State axis and positive rotation direction.
  2. Label radians and distinguish revolutions.
  3. Connect graph slope/area before equations.
  4. Distinguish shared angular variables from radius-dependent linear variables.
  5. Match the inertia formula to shape and axis.

Misconception clinic

“All wheel points have the same linear speed.” They share ω\omega; v=rωv=r\omega.

“Moment of inertia depends only on mass.” Distribution and axis matter.

“Radians have no role because they are dimensionless.” They remain essential labels in angular interpretation.

“Tangential and radial acceleration are the same.” They change speed and direction, respectively.

“Rolling always means v=Rωv=R\omega.” Only rolling without slipping satisfies it.

After learning: retrieval and transfer

  1. What do slope of θ(t)\theta(t) and area under ω(t)\omega(t) represent?
  2. Compare speeds at R/2R/2 and RR.
  3. How does moving point masses to twice the radius change II?
  4. Why does a hoop have larger II than a disk of equal M,RM,R?
  5. What observation indicates rolling slip?

AP-style evidence routine

  1. Define rigid body, axis, sign, and interval.
  2. Connect angular graph representations.
  3. Apply constant-α\alpha equations only when supported.
  4. Convert angular to linear quantities with radius.
  5. Build II from geometry/distribution and check units, limits, and axis.

Key takeaway

Rigid-body points share angular motion but not linear motion. Rotational inertia turns mass distribution and axis choice into a measurable resistance to angular acceleration.

Further learning and alignment

Practice labTest Rotational Inertia by Mass DistributionOpen this when you are ready to apply the model, collect evidence, and check your explanation.1 hr 25 min

Lab: Test Rotational Inertia by Mass Distribution

Objective

For approximately equal applied torque, how does moving equal masses outward affect angular acceleration?

Safety

Teacher supervision is required. Use a commercial low-speed rotational platform with masses securely fastened, inspect clamps/strings, use a protective boundary, keep hair/clothing/hands clear, and stop before repositioning masses. Never spin handheld masses or operate with loose components.

Materials

  • approved low-friction rotational platform;
  • two equal securely mountable masses;
  • fixed-radius torque mechanism or force sensor/string;
  • angular sensor or video marker;
  • ruler/caliper and protective boundary.

Alternative: teacher-provided or simulation dataset when safe apparatus is unavailable.

Steps

  1. Inspect and obtain teacher approval.
  2. Measure masses and two symmetric radii.
  3. Apply the same approved torque protocol at inner radius; record ω(t)\omega(t).
  4. Repeat at least five trials.
  5. Stop fully and secure masses at outer radius.
  6. Repeat identical torque trials.
  7. Fit angular acceleration from ω(t)\omega(t) slope.
  8. Preserve raw data and anomalies.

Expected Result

Moving masses outward increases rotational inertia approximately with r2r^2 contribution and reduces angular acceleration for the same net torque.

Analysis

  • Calculate added point-mass inertia at each radius.
  • Compare measured acceleration ratio with inverse inertia ratio.
  • Include torque consistency, radius, mass, sensor, and fit uncertainty.
  • Discuss bearing friction, platform inertia, string radius, mass placement, and startup transients.

Reflection Questions

  1. Why must platform inertia be included?
  2. How does doubling radius affect added inertia?
  3. What evidence shows torque was comparable?
  4. Why should masses be placed symmetrically?

Claim-evidence-reasoning conclusion

Claim how distribution affected angular acceleration. Cite fitted slopes, ratios, and uncertainty, then connect to τ=Iα\tau=I\alpha.

Accessibility

Offer safety, setup, measurement, sensor, data, graphing, uncertainty, and narration roles. Use tactile/high-contrast markers and screen-reader tables. Analysis may use shared/simulated data.

Extension Challenge

Use acceleration and known torque to estimate total inertia for both configurations and compare the difference with mr2\sum mr^2 prediction.